3.8 Article

Synthesis, characterization, and cytocompatibility of efastomeric, biodegradable poly(ester-urethane)ureas based on poly(caprolactone) and putrescine

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages 493-503

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.10204

Keywords

biodegradation; surface modification; poly(ester-urethane)urea; cell adhesion; radio frequency glow discharge

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The engineering of tissue for mechanically demanding applications in the cardiovascular system is likely to require mechanical conditioning of cell-scaffold constructs prior to their implantation. Scaffold properties amenable to such an application include high elasticity and strength coupled with controllable biodegradative and cell-adhesive properties. To fulfill such design criteria, we have synthesized a family of poly(ester-urethane)ureas (PEUUs) from polycaprolactone and 1,4-diisocyanatobutane. Lysine ethyl ester (Lys) or putrescine was used as chain extenders. To encourage cell adhesion, PEUUs were surface modified with radio-frequency glow discharge followed by coupling of Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser (RGDS). The synthesized PELTUs were highly flexible, with breaking strains of 660-895% and tensile strengths from 9.2-29 MPa. Incubation in aqueous buffer for 8 weeks resulted in mass loss, from >50% (Lys chain extender) to 10% (putrescine chain extender). Human endothelial cells cultured for 4 days with medium containing the degradation products from PELTUs with either the Lys or putrescine chain extender showed no toxic effects. Cell adhesion was 85% of that measured on tissue-culture polystyrene for unmodified PEUU surfaces (p < 0.01) and > 160% (p < 0.001) of polystyrene on RGDS-modified PELTUs. These biodegradable PEUUs demonstrate potential for future application as cell scaffolds in cardiovascular tissue-engineering or other soft-tissue applications. (C) 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available