4.7 Article

SUNYAEV-ZEL'DOVICH EFFECT OBSERVATIONS OF STRONG LENSING GALAXY CLUSTERS: PROBING THE OVERCONCENTRATION PROBLEM

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 737, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/74

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-0838187, PHY-0114422]
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  3. Kenneth T. and Eileen L. Norris Foundation
  4. James S. McDonnell Foundation
  5. Associates of the California Institute of Technology
  6. University of Chicago
  7. state of California
  8. state of Illinois
  9. state of Maryland
  10. National Science Foundation
  11. NASA [HF-51259.01, PF0-110077]
  12. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  13. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1009012] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have measured the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect for a sample of 10 strong lensing selected galaxy clusters using the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Array (SZA). The SZA is sensitive to structures on spatial scales of a few arcminutes, while the strong lensing mass modeling constrains the mass at small scales (typically <30 ''). Combining the two provides information about the projected concentrations of the strong lensing clusters. The Einstein radii we measure are twice as large as expected given the masses inferred from SZ scaling relations. A Monte Carlo simulation indicates that a sample randomly drawn from the expected distribution would have a larger median Einstein radius than the observed clusters about 3% of the time. The implied overconcentration has been noted in previous studies and persists for this sample, even when we take into account that we are selecting large Einstein radius systems, suggesting that the theoretical models still do not fully describe the observed properties of strong lensing clusters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available