4.7 Article

X-RAY DIAGNOSTICS OF GIANT MOLECULAR CLOUDS IN THE GALACTIC CENTER REGION AND PAST ACTIVITY OF Sgr A*

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 740, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/103

Keywords

Galaxy: center; ISM: individual objects (Sgr B2); radiative transfer; scattering; X-rays: ISM

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists
  2. Global Center of Excellence for Physical Sciences Frontier), MEXT, Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [09J10058] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Strong iron fluorescence at 6.4 keV and hard-X-ray emissions from giant molecular clouds in the Galactic center region have been interpreted as reflections of a past outburst of the Sgr A* supermassive black hole. Careful treatment of multiple interactions of photons in a complicated geometry is essential to modeling the reprocessed emissions from the dense clouds. We develop a new calculation framework of X-ray reflection from molecular clouds based on Monte Carlo simulations for accurate interpretation of high-quality observational data. By utilizing this simulation framework, we present the first calculations of morphologies and spectra of the reflected X-ray emission for several realistic models of Sgr B2, which is the most massive molecular cloud in our Galaxy. The morphology of scattered hard X-rays above 20 keV is significantly different from that of iron fluorescence due to their large penetrating power into dense regions of the cloud, probing the structure of the cloud. High-resolution spectra provide quantitative evaluation of the iron line including its Compton shoulder to constrain the mass and the chemical composition of the cloud as well as the luminosity of the illuminating source. These predictions can be checked in the near future with future X-ray missions such as NuStar (hard X-rays) and ASTRO-H (both iron lines and hard X-rays).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available