4.6 Article

Aminoglycoside antibiotics induce pH-sensitive activation of the calcium-sensing receptor

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)02133-2

Keywords

intracellular calcium; calcium receptor; intracellular pH; fura-2 AM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aminoglycoside antibiotic (AGA) neomycin is a known agonist of the extracellular calcium-sensing receptor (CaR). To test whether other AGA drugs stimulate the Calk, we studied the relative effects of four AGAs on intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+](i)) using CaR-transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells. Gentamicin, tobramycin, and neomycin evoked dose-dependent increases in [Ca2+](i) with EC50 values of 258, 177, and 43 muM, respectively, in CaR-transfected, but not in non-transfected cells. Kanamycin was ineffective at doses <1 mM. Thus, AGAs stimulate the CaR with a rank order of potency that correlates positively with the number of their attached amino groups. The CaR is expressed on the apical surface of renal proximal tubule cells, which is also the site of AGA endocytosis and nephrotoxicity. In the current study, reducing extracellular pH from 7.4 to 6.9, to mimic the luminal pH of the proximal tubule, enhanced the sensitivity of the CaR to tobramycin, suggesting that the AGAs may be more potent CaR agonists in the proximal tubule than elsewhere. This pH effect was not observed when stimulating Calk with the non-ionizable agonist, Gd3+, suggesting that the enhanced AGA effect is due to increased ionization of the drug. Thus, we show that a number of AGA drugs are capable of CaR activation and that their potency most likely relates to the number of their amino side chains and to their pH-dependent charge characteristics. The contribution of CaR activation to the pharmacological/toxicological effects of these AGAs remains to be determined. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available