4.7 Article

PRESOLAR GRAINS FROM NOVAE: EVIDENCE FROM NEON AND HELIUM ISOTOPES IN COMET DUST COLLECTIONS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 742, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/86

Keywords

circumstellar matter; comets: individual (26P, 55P); methods: analytical; methods: laboratory; novae, cataclysmic variables; nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances

Funding

  1. NASA at Minnesota
  2. NSF at Minnesota
  3. U.S. Air Force
  4. NSF
  5. NASA
  6. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1007977] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Presolar grains in meteorites and interplanetary dust particles carry non-solar isotopic signatures pointing to origins in supernovae, giant stars, and possibly other stellar sources. There have been suggestions that some of these grains condensed in the ejecta of classical nova outbursts, but the evidence is ambiguous. We report neon and helium compositions in particles captured on stratospheric collectors flown to sample materials from comets 26P/Grigg-Skjellerup and 55P/Tempel-Tuttle that point to condensation of their gas carriers in the ejecta of a neon (ONe) nova. The absence of detectable He-3 in these particles indicates space exposure to solar wind irradiation of a few decades at most, consistent with origins in cometary dust streams. Measured He-4/Ne-20, Ne-20/Ne-22, Ne-21/Ne-22, and Ne-20/Ne-21 isotope ratios, and a low upper limit on He-3/He-4, are in accord with calculations of nucleosynthesis in neon nova outbursts. Of these, the uniquely low He-4/Ne-20 and high Ne-20/Ne-22 ratios are the most diagnostic, reflecting the large predicted Ne-20 abundances in the ejecta of such novae. The correspondence of measured Ne and He compositions in cometary matter with theoretical predictions is evidence for the presence of presolar grains from novae in the early solar system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available