4.6 Article

Age-dependent cellular immune responses to Plasmodium vivax Duffy binding protein in humans

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 169, Issue 6, Pages 3200-3207

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.6.3200

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI033656-08, R01 AI033656] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Plasmodium vivax merozoite Duffy binding protein (DBP) contains a cysteine-rich region II (DBPII) that binds to the Duffy Ag receptor for chemokines on erythrocytes, which is essential for parasite invasion. Cellular immune responses to DBPII have not been reported in P. vivax endemic populations, although they may contribute to partial acquired immunity. To examine host cellular immunity to DBPII and identify major T cell epitopes, PBMCs from 107 individuals (2-68 years old) were examined for cytokine production by ELISPOT and/or ELISA to rDBP and overlapping peptides (displaced by 2 aa spanning a 170-aa region of DBPII corresponding to the critical binding motif to the Duffy Ag receptor for chemokines). In P. vivax-exposed subjects, 60 and 71% generated significant rDBP-induced IFN-gamma and IL-10 production, respectively, 11% stimulated IL-2, and IL-5 and IL-13 were not detected. Children <5 years of age had reduced levels and frequency of rDBP-induced IL-10 and IFN-gamma production compared with partially immune older children and adults (p < 0.01). Five major T cell epitopes were identified. Three of these T cell epitopes contained polymorphic residues present in the population. Peptides synthesized corresponding to these variants induced IFN-gamma and IL-10 production to one variant and little response to the other variant in the same individual. These results demonstrate age-dependent and variant-specific cellular immune responses to DBPII and implicate this molecule in partial acquired immunity to P. vivax in endemic populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available