4.7 Article

DISCOVERY AND CHARACTERIZATION OF AN EXTREMELY DEEP-ECLIPSING CATACLYSMIC VARIABLE: LSQ172554.8-643839

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 732, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/732/1/51

Keywords

binaries: eclipsing; novae, cataclysmic variables; stars: dwarf novae

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  3. Center of Excellence in Astrophysics and Associated Technologies [PFB-06]
  4. Millennium Center for Supernova Science through Programa Bicentenario de Ciencia y Tecnologia de CONICYT [P06-045-F]
  5. Programa Iniciativa Cientifica Milenio de MIDEPLAN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the discovery of an eclipsing cataclysmic variable with eclipse depths > 5.7 mag, orbital period 94.657 minutes, and peak brightness V similar to 18 at J2000 position 17(h)25(m)54(s). 8, -64 degrees 38'39 ''. Detected by visual inspection of images from Yale University's QUEST camera on the European Southern Observatory 1.0 m Schmidt telescope at La Silla, we obtained light curves in B, V, R, I, z, and J with SMARTS 1.3 m and 1.0 m telescopes at Cerro Tololo and spectra from 3500 to 9000 angstrom with the SOAR 4.3 m telescope at Cerro Pachon. The optical light curves show a deep, 5-minute eclipse immediately followed by a shallow 38-minute eclipse and then sinusoidal variation. No eclipses appear in J. During the deep eclipse we measure V-J > 7.1, corresponding to a spectral type M8 or later secondary, consistent with the dynamical constraints. The estimated distance is 150 ps. The spectra show strong hydrogen emission lines, Doppler broadened by 600-1300 km s(-1), oscillating with radial velocity that peaks at mid deep eclipse with semi-amplitude 500 +/- 22 km s(-1). We suggest that LSQ172554.8-643839 is a polar with a low-mass secondary viewed at high inclination. No known radio or X-ray source coincides with the new object's location.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available