4.7 Article

EFFECT OF A DARK MATTER HALO ON THE DETERMINATION OF BLACK HOLE MASSES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 729, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/729/1/21

Keywords

black hole physics; galaxies: general; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; galaxies: nuclei

Funding

  1. DAAD
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SPP1177, Wi 1369/23-2]
  3. NSF [0908639]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0908639] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stellar dynamical modeling is a powerful method to determine the mass of black holes in quiescent galaxies. However, in previous work the presence of a dark matter halo has been ignored in the modeling. Gebhardt & Thomas in 2009 showed that accounting for a dark matter halo increased the black hole mass of the massive galaxy M87 by a factor of two. We used a sample of 12 galaxies to investigate the effect of accounting for a dark matter halo in the dynamical modeling in more detail, and also updated the masses using improved modeling. The sample of galaxies possesses Hubble Space Telescope and ground-based observations of stellar kinematics. Their black hole masses have been presented before, but without including a dark matter halo in the models. Without a dark halo, we find a mean increase in the estimated mass of 1.5 for the whole sample compared to previous results. We attribute this change to using a more complete orbit library. When we include a dark matter halo, along with the updated models, we find an additional increase in black hole mass by a factor of 1.2 in the mean, much less than for M87. We attribute the smaller discrepancy in black hole mass to using data that better resolve the black hole's sphere of influence. We redetermined the M-center dot-sigma(*) and M-center dot-L-V relationships using our updated black hole masses and found a slight increase in both normalization and intrinsic scatter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available