4.7 Article

PROBING THE FLARE ATMOSPHERES OF M DWARFS USING INFRARED EMISSION LINES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 745, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/14

Keywords

line: formation; stars: activity; stars: chromospheres; stars: flare; stars: late-type

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [AST 08-07205]
  2. NSF Astronomy & Astrophysics postdoctoral Fellowship [AST 08-02230]
  3. Mary Gates Research Scholarship
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0807205] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the results of a campaign to monitor active M dwarfs using infrared spectroscopy, supplemented with optical photometry and spectroscopy. We detected 16 flares during nearly 50 hr of observations on EV Lac, AD Leo, YZ CMi, and VB 8. The three most energetic flares also showed infrared emission, including the first reported detections of P beta, P gamma, HeI lambda 10830, and Br gamma during an M dwarf flare. The strongest flare (Delta u = 4.02 on EV Lac) showed emission from H gamma, H delta, HeI lambda 4471, and CaII K in the UV/blue and P beta, P gamma, P delta, Br gamma, and HeI lambda 10830 in the infrared. The weaker flares (Delta u = 1.68 on EV Lac and Delta U = 1.38 on YZ CMi) were only observed with photometry and infrared spectroscopy; both showed emission from P beta, P gamma, and HeI lambda 10830. The strongest infrared emission line, P beta, occurred in the active mid-M dwarfs with a duty cycle of similar to 3%-4%. To examine the most energetic flare, we used the static NLTE radiative transfer code RH to produce model spectra based on a suite of one-dimensional model atmospheres. Using a hotter chromosphere than previous one-dimensional atmospheric models, we obtain line ratios that match most of the observed emission lines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available