4.6 Article

Single mutation (A162H) in human cardiac troponin I corrects acid pH sensitivity of Ca2+-regulated actomyosin S1 ATPase

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 277, Issue 38, Pages 34662-34665

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.C200419200

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In contrast to skeletal muscle, the efficiency of the contractile apparatus of cardiac tissue has long been known to be severely compromised by acid pH as in the ischemia of myocardial infarction and other cardiac myopathies. Recent reports (Westfall, M. V., and Metzger, J. M. (2001) News Physiol. Sci. 16,278-281; Li, G., Martin, A. F., and Solaro, R. J. (2001) J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 33, 1309-1320) have indicated that the reduced Ca2+ sensitivity of cardiac contractility at low pH (less than or equal topH 6.5) is attributable to structural difference(s) in the cardiac and skeletal inhibitory components (TnIs) of their troponins. Here, using a reconstituted Ca2+-regulated human cardiac troponin-tropomyosin actomyosin S1 ATPase assay, we report that a single TnI mutation, A162H, restores Ca2+ sensitivity at pH 6.5 to that at pH 7.0. Levels of inhibition (pCa 7.0), activation (pCa 4.0), and cooperativity of ATPase activity were minimally affected. Two other mutations (Q155R and E164V) also previously suggested by us (Pearlstone, J. R., Sykes, B. D., and Smillie, L. B. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 7601-7606) and involving charged residues showed no such effects. With fast skeletal muscle troponin, a single TnI H130A mutation reduced Ca2+ sensitivity at pH 6.5 to levels approaching the cardiac system at pH 6.5. These observations provide structural insight into long-standing physiological and clinical phenomena and are of potential relevance to therapeutic treatments of heart disease by gene transfer, stem cell, and cell transplantation approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available