4.7 Article

THE LARGE-SCALE BIAS OF DARK MATTER HALOS: NUMERICAL CALIBRATION AND MODEL TESTS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 724, Issue 2, Pages 878-886

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/724/2/878

Keywords

cosmology: theory; large-scale structure of universe; methods: numerical

Funding

  1. NASA [HST-HF-51262.01-A, NAS5-26555, NAG5-13274]
  2. NSF [AST-0239759, AST-0507666]
  3. Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  4. US Department of Energy [W-7405ENG-36]
  5. German Academic Exchange Service
  6. A.I. Hispano-Alemanas
  7. DFG
  8. M.E.C [FPA2006-01105, AYA2006-15492-C03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We measure the clustering of dark matter halos in a large set of collisionless cosmological simulations of the flat Lambda CDM cosmology. Halos are identified using the spherical overdensity algorithm, which finds the mass around isolated peaks in the density field such that the mean density is Delta times the background. We calibrate fitting functions for the large-scale bias that are adaptable to any value of Delta we examine. We find a similar to 6% scatter about our best-fit bias relation. Our fitting functions couple to the halo mass functions of Tinker et al. such that the bias of all dark matter is normalized to unity. We demonstrate that the bias of massive, rare halos is higher than that predicted in the modified ellipsoidal collapse model of Sheth et al. and approaches the predictions of the spherical collapse model for the rarest halos. Halo bias results based on friends-of-friends halos identified with linking length 0.2 are systematically lower than for halos with the canonical Delta = 200 overdensity by similar to 10%. In contrast to our previous results on the mass function, we find that the universal bias function evolves very weakly with redshift, if at all. We use our numerical results, both for the mass function and the bias relation, to test the peak-background split model for halo bias. We find that the peak-background split achieves a reasonable agreement with the numerical results, but similar to 20% residuals remain, both at high and low masses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available