4.7 Article

LUMINOSITY-METALLICITY RELATIONS FOR BLUE COMPACT DWARF GALAXIES IN THE OPTICAL AND NEAR-INFRARED

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 710, Issue 1, Pages 663-675

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/663

Keywords

galaxies: abundances; galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: starburst

Funding

  1. NSF of China [10903029, 10425313, 10833006, 10621303, 10878010, 10633040]
  2. Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds [0802031C]
  3. K.C. Wong Education Foundation, Hong Kong
  4. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2007CB815405, 2007CB815406]
  5. Brazilian agencies CNPq
  6. Brazilian agencies CAPES
  7. Brazilian agencies FAPESP
  8. France-Brazil CAPES/Cofecub program
  9. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  10. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  11. Participating Institutions
  12. National Science Foundation
  13. U.S. Department of Energy
  14. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  15. Max Planck Society
  16. Higher Education Funding Council for England

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we present systematic studies on the B-, R- and K(s)-band luminosity-metallicity (L-Z) relations for a set of metal-poor, blue compact dwarf galaxies (BCDs). Metallicity is derived by using both the empirical N2 and the direct T(e) methods. Our work reconciles contradictory results obtained by different authors and shows that the L-Z relationship does also hold for BCDs. The empirical N2-based slope of the L-Z relation, for each photometric band, is consistent with the T(e)-based one. We confirm that the slope of the L-Z relation is shallower in the near-infrared than that in the optical. Our investigations on the correlations between the LB-Z relation residuals and different galactic parameters show that the star formation activities could be a cause of the large scatter in the optical L-Z relationships, whereas the internal absorption might be another possible contributing factor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available