4.7 Article

THE EQUATION OF STATE FROM OBSERVED MASSES AND RADII OF NEUTRON STARS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 722, Issue 1, Pages 33-54

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/33

Keywords

dense matter; stars: neutron; X-rays: binaries; X-rays: bursts

Funding

  1. Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics at MSU under NSF PHY [08-22648]
  2. NASA ATFP [NNX08AG76G]
  3. U.S. DOE [DE-AC02-87ER40317]
  4. NASA [NNX08AG76G, 101261] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We determine an empirical dense matter equation of state (EOS) from a heterogeneous data set of six neutron stars: three Type-IX-ray bursters with photospheric radius expansion, studied by Ozel et al., and three transient low-mass X-ray binaries. We critically assess the mass and radius determinations from the X-ray burst sources and show explicitly how systematic uncertainties, such as the photospheric radius at touchdown, affect the most probable masses and radii. We introduce a parameterized EOS and use a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm within a Bayesian framework to determine nuclear parameters such as the incompressibility and the density dependence of the bulk symmetry energy. Using this framework we show, for the first time, that these parameters, predicted solely on the basis of astrophysical observations, all lie in ranges expected from nuclear systematics and laboratory experiments. We find significant constraints on the mass-radius relation for neutron stars, and hence on the pressure-density relation of dense matter. The predicted symmetry energy and the EOS near the saturation density are soft, resulting in relatively small neutron star radii around 11-12 km for M = 1.4M(circle dot). The predicted EOS stiffens at higher densities, however, and our preferred model for X-ray bursts suggests that the neutron star maximum mass is relatively large, 1.9-2.2 M-circle dot. Our results imply that several commonly used equations of state are inconsistent with observations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available