4.7 Article

HIGHLY IONIZED POTASSIUM LINES IN SOLAR X-RAY SPECTRA AND THE ABUNDANCE OF POTASSIUM

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 710, Issue 1, Pages 804-809

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/804

Keywords

line: identification; Sun: abundances; Sun: corona; Sun: flares; Sun: X-rays, gamma rays

Funding

  1. European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/20072013, 218816]
  2. Polish Ministry of Education and Science [N203 381736]
  3. UK-Royal Society/Polish Academy of Sciences International Joint Project [2006/R3]
  4. STFC [PP/E001173/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E001173/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The abundance of potassium is derived from X-ray lines observed during flares by the RESIK instrument on the solar mission CORONAS-F between 3.53 angstrom and 3.57 angstrom. The lines include those emitted by He-like K and Li-like K dielectronic satellites, which have been synthesized using the chianti atomic code and newly calculated atomic data. There is good agreement between observed and synthesized spectra, and the theoretical behavior of the spectra with varying temperature estimated from the ratio of the two GOES channels is correctly predicted. The observed fluxes of the He-like K resonance line per unit emission measure give log A(K) = 5.86 (on a scale log A(H) = 12), with a total range of a factor 2.9. This is higher than photospheric abundance estimates by a factor 5.5, a slightly greater enhancement than for other elements with first ionization potential (FIP) less than similar to 10 eV. There is, then, the possibility that enrichment of low-FIP elements in coronal plasmas depends weakly on the value of the FIP which for K is extremely low (4.34 eV). Our work also suggests that fractionation of elements to form the FIP effect occurs in the low chromosphere rather than higher up, as in some models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available