4.7 Article

THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE OF INTERIOR EJECTA IN CASSIOPEIA A AT HIGH SPECTRAL RESOLUTION

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 725, Issue 2, Pages 2059-2070

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/2059

Keywords

infrared: general; ISM: individual objects (Cassiopeia A); ISM: supernova remnants; supernovae: general

Funding

  1. NASA [1407]
  2. NASA/SAO [AR5-6008X]
  3. NASA/JPL [1265552]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We used the Spitzer Space Telescope's Infrared Spectrograph to create a high-resolution spectral map of the central region of the Cassiopeia A (Cas A) supernova remnant, allowing us to make a Doppler reconstruction of its three-dimensional structure. The ejecta responsible for this emission have not yet encountered the remnant's reverse shock or the circumstellar medium, making it an ideal laboratory for exploring the dynamics of the supernova explosion itself. We observe that the O, Si, and S ejecta can form both sheet-like structures and filaments. Si and O, which come from different nucleosynthetic layers of the star, are observed to be coincident in velocity space in some regions, and separated by 500 km s(-1) or more in others. Ejecta traveling toward us are, on average, similar to 900 km s(-1) slower than the material traveling away from us. We compare our observations to recent supernova explosion models and find that no single model can simultaneously reproduce all the observed features. However, models of different supernova explosions can collectively produce the observed geometries and structures of the interior emission. We use the results from the models to address the conditions during the supernova explosion, concentrating on asymmetries in the shock structure. We also predict that the back surface of Cas A will begin brightening in similar to 30 years, and the front surface in similar to 100 years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available