4.7 Article

FERMI-LAT OBSERVATIONS OF THE GEMINGA PULSAR

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 720, Issue 1, Pages 272-283

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/272

Keywords

gamma rays: stars; pulsars: general; pulsars: individual (PSR J0633+1746, Geminga)

Funding

  1. K. A. Wallenberg Foundation
  2. International Doctorate on Astroparticle Physics (IDAPP)
  3. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica in Italy
  4. Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales in France
  5. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on the Fermi-LAT observations of the Geminga pulsar, the second brightest non-variable GeV source in the gamma-ray sky and the first example of a radio-quiet gamma-ray pulsar. The observations cover one year, from the launch of the Fermi satellite through 2009 June 15. A data sample of over 60,000 photons enabled us to build a timing solution based solely on gamma-rays. Timing analysis shows two prominent peaks, separated by Delta phi = 0.497 +/- 0.004 in phase, which narrow with increasing energy. Pulsed gamma-rays are observed beyond 18 GeV, precluding emission below 2.7 stellar radii because of magnetic absorption. The phase-averaged spectrum was fitted with a power law with exponential cutoff of spectral index Gamma = (1.30 +/- 0.01 +/- 0.04), cutoff energy E-0 = (2.46 +/- 0.04 +/- 0.17) GeV, and an integral photon flux above 0.1 GeV of (4.14 +/- 0.02 +/- 0.32) x 10(-6) cm(-2) s(-1). The first uncertainties are statistical and the second ones are systematic. The phase-resolved spectroscopy shows a clear evolution of the spectral parameters, with the spectral index reaching a minimum value just before the leading peak and the cutoff energy having maxima around the peaks. The phase-resolved spectroscopy reveals that pulsar emission is present at all rotational phases. The spectral shape, broad pulse profile, and maximum photon energy favor the outer magnetospheric emission scenarios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available