4.7 Article

THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE OF CASSIOPEIA A

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 725, Issue 2, Pages 2038-2058

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/2038

Keywords

infrared: ISM; ISM: individual objects (Cassiopeia A); ISM: supernova remnants; X-rays: ISM

Funding

  1. NASA [1407, AR5-6008X, GO3-4063A, SV3-73016, NAS8-03060]
  2. NASA/JPL [1264030]
  3. NASA-WV Space Grant Consortium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We used the Spitzer Space Telescope's Infrared Spectrograph to map nearly the entire extent of Cassiopeia A between 5 and 40 mu m. Using infrared and Chandra X-ray Doppler velocity measurements, along with the locations of optical ejecta beyond the forward shock, we constructed a three-dimensional model of the remnant. The structure of Cas A can be characterized into a spherical component, a tilted thick disk, and multiple ejecta jets/pistons and optical fast-moving knots all populating the thick disk plane. The Bright Ring in Cas A identifies the intersection between the thick plane/pistons and a roughly spherical reverse shock. The ejecta pistons indicate a radial velocity gradient in the explosion. Some ejecta pistons are bipolar with oppositely directed flows about the expansion center while some ejecta pistons show no such symmetry. Some ejecta pistons appear to maintain the integrity of the nuclear burning layers while others appear to have punched through the outer layers. The ejecta pistons indicate a radial velocity gradient in the explosion. In three dimensions, the Fe jet in the southeast occupies a hole in the Si-group emission and does not represent overturning, as previously thought. Although interaction with the circumstellar medium affects the detailed appearance of the remnant and may affect the visibility of the southeast Fe jet, the bulk of the symmetries and asymmetries in Cas A are intrinsic to the explosion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available