4.7 Article

THE FORMATION OF MASSIVE CLUSTER GALAXIES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 720, Issue 1, Pages 284-298

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/284

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: evolution galaxies: formation; galaxies: luminosity function, mass function

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [AST-0708490]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [W-7405-Eng-48, DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  3. NASA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present composite 3.6 and 4.5 mu m luminosity functions (LFs) for cluster galaxies measured from the Spitzer Deep, Wide-Field Survey for 0.3 < z < 2. We compare the evolution of m* for these LFs to models for passively evolving stellar populations to constrain the primary epoch of star formation in massive cluster galaxies. At low redshifts (z less than or similar to 1.3), our results agree well with models with no mass assembly and passively evolving stellar populations with a luminosity-weighted mean formation redshift z(f) = 2.4 assuming a Kroupa initial mass function (IMF). We conduct a thorough investigation of systematic biases that might influence our results, and estimate systematic uncertainties of Delta z(f) = (+0.16)(-0.18) (model normalization), Delta z(f) = (+0.40)(-0.05) (a), and Delta z(f) = (+0.30)(-0.45) (choice of stellar population model). For a Salpeter-type IMF, the typical formation epoch is thus strongly constrained to be z similar to 2-3. Higher formation redshifts can only be made consistent with the data if one permits an evolving IMF that is bottom-light at high redshift, as suggested by van Dokkum. At high redshifts (z greater than or similar to 1.3), we also witness a statistically significant (>5 sigma) disagreement between the measured LF and the continuation of the passive evolution model from lower redshifts. After considering potential systematic biases that might influence our highest redshift data points, we interpret the observed deviation as potential evidence for ongoing mass assembly at this epoch.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available