4.7 Article

TIDAL TORQUING OF ELLIPTICAL GALAXIES IN CLUSTER ENVIRONMENTS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 721, Issue 2, Pages 939-955

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/721/2/939

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; methods: numerical

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX07AV06G]
  2. NSF [AST-05-07161, AST-05-47823, MCA06T030]
  3. Columbia University
  4. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0908390] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observational studies of galaxy isophotal shapes have shown that galaxy orientations are anisotropic: a galaxy's long axis tends to be oriented toward the center of its host. This radial alignment is seen across a wide range of scales, from galaxies in massive clusters to small Milky Way type satellite systems. Recently, this effect has also been detected in dark matter (DM) simulations of cosmological structure, but the degree of alignment of DM substructures in these studies is significantly stronger than seen in observations. In this paper, we attempt to reconcile these two results by performing high-resolution numerical experiments on N-body multi-component models of triaxial galaxies orbiting in an external analytical potential. The large number of particles employed allows us to probe deep into the inner structure of the galaxy: we show that the discrepancy between observed galaxies and simulated DM halos is a natural consequence of induced radial shape twisting in the galaxy by the external potential. The degree of twisting depends strongly on the orbital phase and eccentricity of the satellite, and it can, under certain conditions, be significant at radii smaller than the DM scale radius. Such internal misalignments will have important consequences, both for the dynamical evolution of the galaxy itself and for mass modeling of galaxies in clustered environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available