4.7 Article

SUNYAEV-ZEL'DOVICH CLUSTER PROFILES MEASURED WITH THE SOUTH POLE TELESCOPE

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 716, Issue 2, Pages 1118-1135

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1118

Keywords

cosmic background radiation; cosmology: observations; galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [ANT-0638937, ANT-0130612]
  2. NSF Physics Frontier Center [PHY-0114422]
  3. STFC [ST/G002711/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) measurements of 15 massive X-ray-selected galaxy clusters obtained with the South Pole Telescope (SPT). The SZ cluster signals are measured at 150 GHz, and concurrent 220 GHz data are used to reduce astrophysical contamination. Radial profiles are computed using a technique that takes into account the effects of the beams and filtering. In several clusters, significant SZ decrements are detected out to a substantial fraction of the virial radius. The profiles are fit to the beta-model and to a generalized Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) pressure profile, and are scaled and stacked to probe their average behavior. We find model parameters that are consistent with previous studies: beta = 0.86 and r(core)/r(500) = 0.20 for the beta-model, and (alpha(n), beta(n), gamma(n), c(500)) = (1.0, 5.5, 0.5, 1.0) for the generalized NFW model. Both models fit the SPT data comparably well, and both are consistent with the average SZ profile out to beyond r(500). The integrated Compton-y parameter Y-SZ is computed for each cluster using both model-dependent and model-independent techniques, and the results are compared to X-ray estimates of cluster parameters. We find that Y-SZ scales with Y-X and gas mass with low scatter. Since these observables have been found to scale with total mass, our results point to a tight mass-observable relation for the SPT cluster survey.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available