4.7 Article

USING THE 1.6 μm BUMP TO STUDY REST-FRAME NEAR-INFRARED-SELECTED GALAXIES AT REDSHIFT 2

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 721, Issue 2, Pages 1056-1078

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/721/2/1056

Keywords

galaxies: distances and redshifts; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift; techniques: photometric

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada
  2. Canadian Space Agency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We explore the feasibility and limitations of using the 1.6 mu m bump as a photometric redshift indicator and selection technique, and use it to study the rest-frame H-band galaxy luminosity and stellar mass functions (SMFs) at redshift z similar to 2. We use publicly available Spitzer/IRAC images in the GOODS fields and find that color selection in the IRAC bandpasses alone is comparable in completeness and contamination to BzK selection. We find that the shape of the 1.6 mu m bump is robust, and photometric redshifts are not greatly affected by choice of model parameters. Comparison with spectroscopic redshifts shows photometric redshifts to be reliable. We create a rest-frame NIR-selected catalog of galaxies at z similar to 2 and construct a galaxy SMF. Comparisons with other SMFs at approximately the same redshift but determined using shorter wavelengths show good agreement. This agreement suggests that selection at bluer wavelengths does not miss a significant amount of stellar mass in passive galaxies. Comparison with SMFs at other redshifts shows evidence for the downsizing scenario of galaxy evolution. We conclude by pointing out the potential for using the 1.6 mu m bump technique to select high-redshift galaxies with the JWST, whose. > 0.6 mu m coverage will not be well suited to selecting galaxies using techniques that require imaging at shorter wavelengths.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available