4.7 Article

SPATIALLY AND SPECTRALLY RESOLVED HYDROGEN GAS WITHIN 0.1 AU OF T TAURI AND HERBIG Ae/Be STARS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 718, Issue 2, Pages 774-794

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/718/2/774

Keywords

circumstellar matter; stars: individual (AS 205, AS 353, DG Tau, DK Tau, DR Tau, MWC 275, MWC 480, MWC 758, MWC 863, MWC 1080, RY Tau, RW Aur, V1057 Cyg, V1331 Cyg, V2508 Oph); stars: pre-main sequence; techniques: interferometric; techniques: spectroscopic

Funding

  1. W. M. Keck Foundation
  2. NSF MRI [AST-0619965]
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  4. University of California [09-LR-01-118057-GRAJ]
  5. NSF [AST-0909188]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present near-infrared observations of T Tauri and Herbig Ae/Be stars with a spatial resolution of a few milliarc-seconds and a spectral resolution of similar to 2000. Our observations spatially resolve gas and dust in the inner regions of protoplanetary disks, and spectrally resolve broad-linewidth emission from the Br gamma transition of hydrogen gas. We use the technique of spectro-astrometry to determine centroids of different velocity components of this gaseous emission at a precision orders of magnitude better than the angular resolution. In all sources, we find the gaseous emission to be more compact than or distributed on similar spatial scales to the dust emission. We attempt to fit the data with models including both dust and Br gamma-emitting gas, and we consider both disk and infall/outflow morphologies for the gaseous matter. In most cases where we can distinguish between these two models, the data show a preference for infall/outflow models. In all cases, our data appear consistent with the presence of some gas at stellocentric radii of similar to 0.01 AU. Our findings support the hypothesis that Br gamma emission generally traces magnetospherically driven accretion and/or outflows in young star/disk systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available