4.7 Article

SIMULATIONS OF THE SUNYAEV-ZEL'DOVICH POWER SPECTRUM WITH ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS FEEDBACK

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 725, Issue 1, Pages 91-99

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/91

Keywords

black hole physics; cosmic background radiation; cosmology: theory; galaxies: clusters: general; large-scale structure of universe; methods: numerical

Funding

  1. NSERC
  2. CIFAR
  3. STFC [PP/E004040/1, ST/H008586/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E004040/1, ST/H008586/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We explore how radiative cooling, supernova feedback, cosmic rays, and a new model of the energetic feedback from active galactic nuclei (AGNs) affect the thermal and kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) power spectra. To do this, we use a suite of hydrodynamical TreePM-SPH simulations of the cosmic web in large periodic boxes and tailored higher resolution simulations of individual galaxy clusters. Our AGN feedback simulations match the recent universal pressure profile and cluster mass scaling relations of the REXCESS X-ray cluster sample better than previous analytical or numerical approaches. For multipoles l less than or similar to 2000, our power spectra with and without enhanced feedback are similar, suggesting that theoretical uncertainties over that range are relatively small, although current analytic and semi-analytic approaches overestimate this SZ power. We find the power at high 2000-10,000 multipoles in which the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) and South Pole Telescope (SPT) probe is sensitive to the feedback prescription, and hence can constrain the theory of intracluster gas, in particular for the highly uncertain redshifts > 0.8. The apparent tension between sigma(8) from primary cosmic microwave background power and from analytic SZ spectra inferred using ACT and SPT data is lessened with our AGN feedback spectra.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available