4.7 Article

Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and whole-brain N-acetylaspartate measurement:: Evidence for different clinical cohorts -: Initial observations

Journal

RADIOLOGY
Volume 225, Issue 1, Pages 261-268

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2243011260

Keywords

magnetic resonance (MR), spectroscopy; sclerosis, multiple

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS37739, NS29029, NS33385] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To quantify the rate of concentration decline of neuronal marker N-acetylaspartate (NAA) in the entire brain of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) in relation to healthy age-matched control subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Whole-brain NAA (WBNAA) concentration was quantified in 49 patients with relapsing-remitting MS by using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and proton MR spectroscopy. It was statistically analyzed by using Spearman rank correlation coefficients to test the intragroup relationship between WBNAA and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score and Mann-Whitney analyses to test for differences between subgroups' EDSS scores versus previously published WBNAA values for healthy subjects, disease duration, and age. RESULTS: Analyses indicated three subgroups of WBNAA dynamics: Ten patients' conditions were stable, exhibiting an insignificant change of about 0% (0.02/14.37) per year of clinically definite disease duration (P = .54); 27 patients showed moderate decline, -2.8% (-0.34/12.18) per year (P < .01); and 12 patients experienced rapid decline, -27.9% (-3.39/12.14) per year (P < .01). No correlation was found between WBNAA deficit, EDSS score, and age. CONCLUSION: Ascertaining an individual's NAA concentration dynamics might enable early forecast of disease course, reflect disease severity and thus influence treatment decisions, and improve clinical trial efficiency by allowing selection of candidates on the basis of WBNAA dynamics in addition to clinical status. (C) RSNA, 2002.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available