4.7 Article

COMBINED STEREO/RHESSI STUDY OF CORONAL MASS EJECTION ACCELERATION AND PARTICLE ACCELERATION IN SOLAR FLARES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 712, Issue 2, Pages 1410-1420

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/1410

Keywords

Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs); Sun: flares; Sun: X-rays, gamma rays

Funding

  1. Austrian Academy of Sciences at the Institute of Physics, University of Graz [APART 11262]
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P20867-N16]
  3. STFC
  4. European Community [218816]
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F002149/1, PP/C001656/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. STFC [ST/F002149/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using the potential of two unprecedented missions, Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) and Reuven Ramaty High-Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI), we study three well-observed fast coronal mass ejections (CMEs) that occurred close to the limb together with their associated high-energy flare emissions in terms of RHESSI hard X-ray (HXR) spectra and flux evolution. From STEREO/EUVI and STEREO/COR1 data, the full CME kinematics of the impulsive acceleration phase up to similar to 4 R-circle dot is measured with a high time cadence of <= 2.5 minutes. For deriving CME velocity and acceleration, we apply and test a new algorithm based on regularization methods. The CME maximum acceleration is achieved at heights h <= 0.4 R-circle dot, and the peak velocity at h <= 2.1 R-circle dot (in one case, as small as 0.5 R-circle dot). We find that the CME acceleration profile and the flare energy release as evidenced in the RHESSI HXR flux evolve in a synchronized manner. These results support the standard flare/CME model which is characterized by a feedback relationship between the large-scale CME acceleration process and the energy release in the associated flare.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available