4.7 Article

Functional magnetic resonance imaging of proactive interference during spoken cued recall

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 543-558

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1229

Keywords

proactive interference; event-related fMRI; overt speech; cued recall; inferior frontal; frontopolar; prefrontal cortex

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Though lesions to frontal cortex can increase susceptibility to interference from previously established but irrelevant memories (proactive interference), the specific regions underlying this problem are difficult to determine because the lesions are typically large and heterogeneous. We used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate proactive interference in healthy volunteers performing an AB-AC paired-associate cued-recall paradigm. At Study, participants intentionally encoded semantically related visual word pairs, which were changed three times (high interference), repeated three times (low interference), or presented only once. At Test, participants were presented with the first word of each pair and attempted to recall its most recent associate from the Study phase. To overcome the problem of image artifacts caused by speech-related head motion, we cued speech during a gap between image acquisitions. Regions in left inferior frontal cortex and bilateral frontopolar cortex showed interference effects during both Study and Test. The pattern of responses in these regions differed, however. Left inferior frontal regions showed mainly reduced responses associated with low interference, whereas frontopolar regions showed mainly increased responses associated with high interference. When incorrect as well as correct trials were analyzed at Test, additional activation associated with high interference was observed in right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. These data suggest that distinct regions within prefrontal cortex subserve different functions in the presence of proactive interference during cued recall., (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available