4.7 Article

Progression to hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: Correlation with intranodular blood supply evaluated with CT during Intraarterial injection of contrast material

Journal

RADIOLOGY
Volume 225, Issue 1, Pages 143-149

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2251011298

Keywords

liver, CT; liver neoplasms, blood supply; liver neoplasms, diagnosis; liver, nodules

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To analyze the correlation between intranodular blood supply of borderline lesions (ie, dysplastic nodules or hypovascular well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] nodules) and their progression to hypervascular classic HCC in cirrhotic livers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-six borderline lesions seen at computed tomography (CT) during arterial portography (CTAP) and CT during hepatic arteriography (CTHA) were evaluated in 49 patients with cirrhosis who underwent repeated CTAP and/or CTHA but no therapy. On the basis of CTAP findings, nodules were categorized as group A (showing almost the same portal venous supply as the surrounding liver), group B (showing decreased portal venous supply) or group C (showing partially absent portal venous supply); on the basis of CTHA findings, nodules were categorized as group I (showing almost the same arterial supply as the liver), group 11 (showing decreased arterial supply), or group III (showing partially increased arterial supply). RESULTS: Progression to classic HCC was observed in 29.4% of group A nodules, 53.9% of group B nodules, and 87.9% of group C nodules within 1,000 days; in 58.6% of group I nodules, 12.9% of group 11 nodules, and 92.2% of group III nodules within 730 days; and in 0% of nodules in group A and 1, 28% of nodules in group B and/or 11, and 88.7% of nodules in group C and/or III within 730 days. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of intranodular blood supply was valuable in predicting the prognosis in borderline lesions, except when only arterial blood supply was evaluated. (C) RSNA, 2002.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available