4.7 Article

THE EFFECT OF STARSPOTS ON ACCURATE RADIUS DETERMINATION OF THE LOW-MASS DOUBLE-LINED ECLIPSING BINARY GU Boo

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 712, Issue 2, Pages 1003-1009

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/1003

Keywords

binaries: eclipsing; binaries: spectroscopic; stars: fundamental parameters; stars: individual (GU Bootis); stars: late-type; starspots

Ask authors/readers for more resources

GU Boo is one of only a relatively small number of well-studied double-lined eclipsing binaries that contain low-mass stars. Lopez-Morales & Ribas present a comprehensive analysis of multi-color light and radial velocity curves for this system. The GU Boo light curves presented by Lopez-Morales & Ribas had substantial asymmetries, which were attributed to large spots. In spite of the asymmetry, Lopez-Morales & Ribas derived masses and radii accurate to similar or equal to 2%. We obtained additional photometry of GU Boo using both a CCD and a single-channel photometer and modeled the light curves with the ELC software to determine if the large spots in the light curves give rise to systematic errors at the few percent level. We also modeled the original light curves from the work of Lopez-Morales & Ribas using models with and without spots. We derived a radius of the primary of 0.6329 +/- 0.0026 R(circle dot), 0.6413 +/- 0.0049 R(circle dot), and 0.6373 +/- 0.0029 R(circle dot) from the CCD, photoelectric, and Lopez-Morales & Ribas data, respectively. Each of these measurements agrees with the value reported by Lopez-Morales & Ribas (R(1) = 0.623 +/- 0.016 R(circle dot)) at the level of approximate to 2%. In addition, the spread in these values is approximate to 1%-2% from the mean. For the secondary, we derive radii of 0.6074 +/- 0.0035 R(circle dot), 0.5944 +/- 0.0069 R(circle dot), and 0.5976 +/- 0.0059 R(circle dot) from the three respective data sets. The Lopez-Morales & Ribas value is R(2) = 0.620 +/- 0.020 R(circle dot), which is approximate to 2%-3% larger than each of the three values we found. The spread in these values is approximate to 2% from the mean. The systematic difference between our three determinations of the secondary radius and that of Lopez-Morales & Ribas might be attributed to differences in the modeling process and codes used. Our own fits suggest that, for GU Boo at least, using accurate spot modeling of a single set of multi-color light curves results in radii determinations accurate at the approximate to 2% level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available