4.7 Article

FOREGROUND CONTAMINATION IN INTERFEROMETRIC MEASUREMENTS OF THE REDSHIFTED 21 cm POWER SPECTRUM

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 695, Issue 1, Pages 183-199

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/183

Keywords

early universe; intergalactic medium; methods: data analysis; radio lines: general; techniques: interferometric

Funding

  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  2. School of Science
  3. NSF [AST-0457585]
  4. NASA [NAS 5-26555]
  5. Hubble Fellowship [HF-01205.01-A]
  6. Space Telescope Science Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Subtraction of astrophysical foreground contamination from dirty skymaps produced by simulated measurements of the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) has been performed by fitting a third-order polynomial along the spectral dimension of each pixel in the data cubes. The simulations are the first to include the unavoidable instrumental effects of the frequency-dependent primary antenna beams and synthesized array beams. They recover the one-dimensional spherically binned input redshifted 21 cm power spectrum within similar to 1% over the scales probed most sensitively by the MWA (0.01 less than or similar to k less than or similar to 1 Mpc(-1)) and demonstrate that realistic instrumental effects will not mask the epoch of reionization signal. We find that the weighting function used to produce the dirty sky maps from the gridded visibility measurements is important to the success of the technique. Uniform weighting of the visibility measurements produces the best results, whereas natural weighting significantly worsens the foreground subtraction by coupling structure in the density of the visibility measurements to spectral structure in the dirty sky map data cube. The extremely dense uv-coverage of the MWA was found to be advantageous for this technique and produced very good results on scales corresponding to |u| less than or similar to 500 lambda in the uv-plane without any selective editing of the uv-coverage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available