4.7 Article

Origin of the black shank resistance gene, Ph, in tobacco cultivar Coker 371-gold

Journal

PLANT DISEASE
Volume 86, Issue 10, Pages 1080-1084

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.10.1080

Keywords

disease resistance genes; gene phylogeny

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) cultivar Coker 371-Gold (C 371-G) possesses a dominant gene, Ph, that confers high resistance to black shank disease, caused by race 0 of the soilborne pathogen Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianae. The origin of this gene is unknown. Breeding lines homozygous for the Ph gene were hybridized with NC 1071 and L8, flue-cured and burley genotypes known to possess qualitative resistance genes from Nicotiana plumbaginifolia and N. longiflora, respectively. The F(1)hybrids were out-crossed to susceptible testers and the progenies evaluated in field black shank nurseries and in greenhouse disease tests with P. parasitica var. nicotianae race 0. Results showed that Ph was allelic to Php from N. plumbaginifolia in NC 1071. Testcross populations of hybrids between burley lines homozygous for Ph and L8, possessing Phl from N. longiflora, showed that Ph and Phl integrated into the same tobacco chromosome during interspecific transfer. Nevertheless, the two loci were estimated to be 3 cM apart. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analyses of the testcross progenies confirmed that recombination between the two loci was occurring. Forty-eight RAPD markers linked to Ph in doubled haploid lines were used in cluster analyses with multiple accessions of N. longiflora and N. plumbaginifolia, breeding lines L8, NC 1071, and DH92-2770-40, and cultivars K 326, Hicks, and C 371-G. A cladogram or region tree confirmed the data obtained from field and greenhouse trials, that Ph, transferred from C 371-G to DH92-2770-40, and Php in NC 1071 were allelic and originated from N. plumbaginifolia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available