4.7 Article

DUST EXTINCTION IN HIGH-z GALAXIES WITH GAMMA-RAY BURST AFTERGLOW SPECTROSCOPY: THE 2175 Å FEATURE AT z=2.45

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 697, Issue 2, Pages 1725-1740

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1725

Keywords

dust, extinction; galaxies: abundances; galaxies: distances and redshifts; galaxies: ISM; gamma rays: bursts

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the clear detection of the 2175 angstrom dust absorption feature in the optical afterglow spectrum of the gamma-ray burst (GRB) GRB 070802 at a redshift of z = 2.45. This is the highest redshift for a detected 2175 angstrom dust bump to date, and it is the first clear detection of the 2175 angstrom bump in a GRB host galaxy, while several tens of optical afterglow spectra without the bump have been recorded in the past decade. The derived extinction curve gives A(V) = 0.8-1.5 depending on the assumed intrinsic slope. Of the three local extinction laws, a Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) type extinction gives the best fit to the extinction curve of the host of GRB 070802. Besides the 2175 angstrom bump we find that the spectrum of GRB 070802 is characterized by unusually strong low-ionization metal lines and possibly a high metallicity for a GRB sightline ([Si/H] = -0.46 +/- 0.38, [Zn/H] = -0.50 +/- 0.68). In particular, the spectrum of GRB 070802 is unique for a GRB spectrum in that it shows clear C I absorption features, leading us to propose a correlation between the presence of the bump and C I. The gas-to-dust ratio for the host galaxy is found to be significantly lower than that of other GRB hosts with N(H I)/ A(V) = (2.4 +/- 1.0) x 10(21) cm(-2) mag(-1), which lies between typical Milky Way and LMC values. Our results are in agreement with the tentative conclusion reached by Gordon et al. that the shape of the extinction curve, in particular the presence of the bump, is affected by the UV flux density in the environment of the dust.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available