4.7 Article

ON THE OCCUPATION FRACTION OF SEED BLACK HOLES IN HIGH-REDSHIFT DARK MATTER HALOS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 701, Issue 1, Pages 360-368

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/701/1/360

Keywords

black hole physics; galaxies: nuclei; gravitational waves

Funding

  1. Hungarian National Office for Research and Technology (NKTH)
  2. OTKA [NI68228]
  3. NASA [NNG04GI88G]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well known that an initial population of seed black holes (BHs), formed in the nuclei of low-mass galaxies at high redshift, can simultaneously explain, through their subsequent growth by mergers and accretion, both the observed evolution of the quasar luminosity function (LF) and the distribution of remnant supermassive black hole (SMBH) masses measured in local galactic nuclei. Here we consider three very different initial conditions for this scenario: models in which initial seed BHs form in either all, or only a small fraction (f(bh) = 0.1 or 0.01) of high-redshift dark matter halos (with M-halo = 5 x 10(9) M-circle dot at z = 6-10). We show that with a suitable and relatively minor adjustment of two global physical parameters (the radiative efficiency and mass accretion time-scale of quasar episodes), models with f(bh) approximate to 0.1 and 1 can accurately reproduce the observed quasar LF at redshifts 0 < z less than or similar to 6, as well as the remnant SMBH mass function at z = 0. However, SMBHs remain rare, and the normalization of the high-z quasar LF and the local SMBH mass function are both significantly underpredicted, if f(bh) less than or similar to 0.01. We also show that the merger history of SMBHs, in the mass range detectable by the future Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) instrument, generically looks different as f(bh) is varied; this should allow LISA to deliver useful constraints on otherwise degenerate models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available