4.7 Article

THE SIGNATURE OF THE ICE LINE AND MODEST TYPE I MIGRATION IN THE OBSERVED EXOPLANET MASS-SEMIMAJOR AXIS DISTRIBUTION

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 691, Issue 2, Pages 1322-1327

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/691/2/1322

Keywords

planetary systems; planetary systems: formation; planetary systems: protoplanetary disks

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  2. NASA [NAGS5-11779, NNG06-GF45G, NNX07A-L13G, NNX07AI88G]
  3. JPL [1270927]
  4. NSF [AST-0507424]
  5. JSPS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Existing exoplanet radial velocity surveys are complete in the planetary mass-semimajor axis (M-p-a) plane over the range 0.1 AU a < 2.0 AU where M-p greater than or similar to 100M(circle plus). We marginalize over mass in this complete domain of parameter space, and demonstrate that the observed a distribution is inconsistent with models of planet formation that use the full Type I migration rate derived from a linear theory and that do not include the effect of the ice line on the disk surface density profile. However, the efficiency of Type I migration can be suppressed by both nonlinear feedback and the barriers introduced by local maxima in the disk pressure distribution, and we confirm that the synthesized Mp-a distribution is compatible with the observed data if we account for both retention of protoplanetary embryos near the ice line and an order-of-magnitude reduction in the efficiency of Type I migration. The validity of these assumptions can be checked because they also predict a population of short-period rocky planets with a range of masses comparable to that of the Earth as well as a desert in the Mp-a distribution centered around M-p similar to 30- 50 M-circle plus and a < 1 AU. We show that the expected desert in the Mp-a plane will be discernible by a radial velocity survey with 1 m s(-1) precision and n similar to 700 radial velocity observations of program stars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available