4.7 Article

THE FATE OF HIGH-VELOCITY CLOUDS: WARM OR COLD COSMIC RAIN?

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 698, Issue 2, Pages 1485-1496

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/698/2/1485

Keywords

Galaxy: evolution; Galaxy: halo; galaxies: ISM; hydrodynamics; methods: numerical

Funding

  1. National Center for Supercomputing Applications [AST 060034]
  2. Research Corporation
  3. NSF [AST 0707597, AST 0748334, AST 0807305, PHY05-51164]
  4. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0917810] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present two sets of grid-based hydrodynamical simulations of high-velocity clouds (HVCs) traveling through the diffuse, hot Galactic halo. These H I clouds have been suggested to provide fuel for ongoing star formation in the Galactic disk. The first set of models is best described as a wind-tunnel experiment in which the HVC is exposed to a wind of constant density and velocity. In the second set of models, we follow the trajectory of the HVC on its way through an isothermal hydrostatic halo toward the disk. Thus, we cover the two extremes of possible HVC trajectories. The resulting cloud morphologies exhibit a pronounced head-tail structure, with a leading dense cold core and a warm diffuse tail. Morphologies and velocity differences between head and tail are consistent with observations. For typical cloud velocities and halo densities, clouds with H I masses <10(4.5) M(circle dot) will lose their H I content within 10 kpc or less. Their remnants may contribute to a population of warm ionized gas clouds in the hot coronal gas, and they may eventually be integrated in the warm ionized Galactic disk. Some of the (still overdense, but now slow) material might recool, forming intermediate or low-velocity clouds close to the Galactic disk. Given our simulation parameters and the limitation set by numerical resolution, we argue that the derived disruption distances are strong upper limits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available