4.7 Article

Activation of NADPH oxidase during progression of cardiac hypertrophy to failure

Journal

HYPERTENSION
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 477-484

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000032031.30374.32

Keywords

hypertrophy; free radicals; heart failure; myocardium; reactive oxygen species

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production is implicated in the pathophysiology of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and heart failure. However, the enzymatic sources of myocardial ROS production are unclear. We examined the expression and activity of phagocyte-type NADPH oxidase in LV myocardium in an experimental guinea pig model of progressive pressure-overload LV hypertrophy. Concomitant with the development of LV hypertrophy, NADPH-dependent O-2(-) production in LV homogenates, measured by lucigenin (5 mumol/L) chemiluminescence or cytochrome c reduction assays, significantly and progressively increased (by approximate to40% at the stage of LV decompensation; P<0.05). O-2(-) production was fully inhibited by diphenyleneiodonium (100 mumol/L). Immunoblotting revealed a progressive increase in expression of the NADPH oxidase subunits p22(phox), gp91(phox), P67(phox), and p47(phox) in the LV hypertrophy group, whereas immunolabeling studies indicated the presence of oxidase subunits in cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells. In parallel with the increase in O-2(-) production, there was a significant increase in activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase 1/2, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. These data indicate that an NADPH oxidase expressed in cardiomyocytes is a major source of ROS generation in pressure overload LV hypertrophy and may contribute to pathophysiological changes such as the activation of redox-sensitive kinases and progression to heart failure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available