4.7 Article

A DETERMINATION OF THE SPIN OF THE BLACK HOLE PRIMARY IN LMC X-1

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 701, Issue 2, Pages 1076-1090

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/1076

Keywords

binaries: general; black hole physics; galaxies: individual (LMC); X-rays: binaries

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX08AJ55G, NNX08AH32G, HST-GO-11227]
  2. Chandra Fellowship Program [PF6-70043]
  3. NSF [AST-0805832]
  4. Smithsonian Endowment Funds
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0807432] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0805832] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. NASA [NNX08AJ55G, 100967] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The first extragalactic X-ray binary, LMC X-1, was discovered in 1969. In the 1980s, its compact primary was established as the fourth dynamical black hole candidate. Recently, we published accurate values for the mass of the black hole and the orbital inclination angle of the binary system. Building on these results, we have analyzed 53 X-ray spectra obtained by RXTE and, using a selected sample of 18 of these spectra, we have determined the dimensionless spin parameter of the black hole to be a(*) = 0.92(-0.07)(+0.05). This result takes into account all sources of observational and model-parameter uncertainties. The standard deviation around the mean value of a(*) for these 18 X-ray spectra, which were obtained over a span of several years, is only Delta a(*) = 0.02. When we consider our complete sample of 53 RXTE spectra, we find a somewhat higher value of the spin parameter and a larger standard deviation. Finally, we show that our results based on RXTE data are confirmed by our analyses of selected X-ray spectra obtained by the XMM-Newton, BeppoSAX, and Ginga missions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available