4.7 Article

SECOND AND THIRD SEASON QUaD COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND TEMPERATURE AND POLARIZATION POWER SPECTRA

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 692, Issue 2, Pages 1247-1270

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/692/2/1247

Keywords

cosmic microwave background; cosmology: observations; polarization

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation in the USA [AST-0096778, ANT-0338138, ANT0338335, ANT-0338238]
  2. Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council in the UK
  3. Science Foundation Ireland
  4. NSF [PHY-0114422]
  5. John B. and Nelly L. Kilroy Foundation Fellowship
  6. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [0739413] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D509552/1, ST/G001979/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. STFC [PP/D509552/1, ST/G001979/1, PP/D001048/1, ST/G002711/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report results from the second and third seasons of observation with the QUaD experiment. Angular power spectra of the cosmic microwave background are derived for both temperature and polarization at both 100 GHz and 150 GHz, and as cross-frequency spectra. All spectra are subjected to an extensive set of jackknife tests to probe for possible systematic contamination. For the implemented data cuts and processing technique such contamination is undetectable. We analyze the difference map formed between the 100 and 150 GHz bands and find no evidence of foreground contamination in polarization. The spectra are then combined to form a single set of results which are shown to be consistent with the prevailing LCDM model. The sensitivity of the polarization results is considerably better than that of any previous experiment for the first time multiple acoustic peaks are detected in the E-mode power spectrum at high significance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available