4.7 Article

STUDIES OF MILLIMETER-WAVE ATMOSPHERIC NOISE ABOVE MAUNA KEA

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 708, Issue 2, Pages 1674-1691

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/1674

Keywords

atmospheric effects; site testing; techniques: photometric

Funding

  1. NASA [NSF/AST-9618798, NSF/AST-0098737, NSF/AST-9980846, NSF/AST-0229008, NSF/AST-0206158]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [838261] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. STFC [ST/G002711/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We reportmeasurements of the fluctuations in atmospheric emission (atmospheric noise) above Mauna Kea recorded with Bolocam at 143 and 268 GHz from the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory. The 143 GHz data were collected during a 40 night observing run in late 2003, and the 268 GHz observations were made in early 2004 and early 2005 over a total of 60 nights. Below similar or equal to 0.5 Hz, the data time-streams are dominated by atmospheric noise in all observing conditions. The atmospheric noise data are consistent with a Kolmogorov-Taylor turbulence model for a thin wind-driven screen, and the median amplitude of the fluctuations is 280 mK(2) rad(-5/3) at 143 GHz and 4000 mK(2) rad(-5/3) at 268 GHz. Comparing our results with previous ACBAR data, we find that the normalization of the power spectrum of the atmospheric noise fluctuations is a factor of similar or equal to 80 larger above Mauna Kea than above the South Pole at millimeter wavelengths. Most of this difference is due to the fact that the atmosphere above the South Pole is much drier than the atmosphere above Mauna Kea. However, the atmosphere above the South Pole is slightly more stable as well: the fractional fluctuations in the column depth of precipitable water vapor are a factor of similar or equal to root 2 smaller at the South Pole compared to Mauna Kea. Based on our atmospheric modeling, we developed several algorithms to remove the atmospheric noise, and the best results were achieved when we described the fluctuations using a low-order polynomial in detector position over the 8' field of view. However, even with these algorithms, we were not able to reach photon-background-limited instrument photometer performance at frequencies below similar or equal to 0.5 Hz in any observing conditions. We also observed an excess low-frequency noise that is highly correlated between detectors separated by less than or similar to(f/#)lambda; this noise appears to be caused by atmospheric fluctuations, but we do not have an adequate model to explain its source. We hypothesize that the correlations arise from the classical coherence of the electromagnetic field across a distance of similar or equal to(f/#)lambda on the focal plane.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available