4.7 Article

THE MEAN TYPE IA SUPERNOVA SPECTRUM OVER THE PAST NINE GIGAYEARS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 693, Issue 2, Pages L76-L80

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/L76

Keywords

cosmological parameters; supernovae: general; ultraviolet: general

Funding

  1. Royal Society
  2. US Department of Energy Scientific Discovery [DE-FG02-06ER06-04]
  3. Benoziyo Center for Astrophysics
  4. Peter and Patricia Gruber Awards
  5. Eda Bess Novick New Scientists Fund at the Weizmann Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examine the possibility of evolution with redshift in the mean rest-frame ultraviolet (UV; lambda less than or similar to 4500 angstrom) spectrum of Type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia) sampling the redshift range 0 < z < 1.3. We find new evidence for a decrease with redshift in the strength of intermediate-mass element (IME) features, particularly Si II and to a lesser extent Ca II H&K and Mg II blends, indicating lower IME abundances in the higher redshift SNe. A larger fraction of luminous, wider light-curve width (higher stretch) SNe Ia are expected at higher redshift than locally, so we compare our observed spectral evolution with that predicted by a redshift-evolving stretch distribution coupled with a stretch-dependent SN Ia spectrum. We show that the sense of the spectral evolution can be reproduced by this simple model, though the highest redshift events seem additionally deficient in Si and Ca. We also examine the mean SN Ia UV-optical colors as a function of redshift, thought to be sensitive to variations in progenitor composition. We find that the expected stretch variations are sufficient to explain the differences, although improved data at z similar to 0 will enable more precise tests. Thus, to the extent possible with the available data sets, our results support the continued use of SNe Ia as standardized candles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available