4.7 Article

THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE BEYOND z=2 FOR MASSIVE GALAXIES: CONTRASTING LARGE STAR-FORMING AND COMPACT QUIESCENT GALAXIES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 705, Issue 1, Pages L71-L75

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/L71

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift

Funding

  1. NASA [HST-GO-11135.08, NAG5-7697]
  2. Space Telescope Science Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present Hubble Space Telescope NIC2 morphologies of a spectroscopic sample of massive galaxies at z similar to 2.3 by extending our sample of 9 compact quiescent galaxies (r(e) similar to 0.9 kpc) with 10 massive emission-line galaxies. The emission-line galaxies are classified by the nature of their ionized emission; there are six star-forming galaxies and four galaxies hosting an active galactic nucleus (AGN). The star-forming galaxies are the largest among the emission-line galaxies, with a median size of r(e) = 2.8 kpc. The three galaxies with the highest star formation rates (greater than or similar to 100 M(circle dot) yr(-1)) have irregular and clumpy morphologies. The AGN host galaxies are more similar to the compact quiescent galaxies in terms of their structures (r(e) similar to 1.1 kpc) and spectral energy distributions. The total sample clearly separates into two classes in a color-mass diagram: the large star-forming galaxies that form the blue cloud, and the compact quiescent galaxies on the red sequence. However, it is unclear how or even if the two classes are evolutionary related. Three out of six massive star-forming galaxies have dense cores and thus may passively evolve into compact galaxies due to fading of outer star-forming regions. For these galaxies, a reverse scenario in which compact galaxies grow inside-out by star formation is also plausible. We do caution though that the sample is small. Nonetheless, it is evident that a Hubble sequence of massive galaxies with strongly correlated galaxy properties is already in place at z > 2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available