4.7 Article

VARIABLE ACCRETION IN THE EMBEDDED PHASE OF STAR FORMATION

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 704, Issue 1, Pages 715-723

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/704/1/715

Keywords

circumstellar matter; hydrodynamics; ISM: clouds; planetary systems: protoplanetary disks; stars: formation

Funding

  1. ACEnet Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivated by the recent detection of a large number of embedded young stellar objects (YSOs) with mass accretion rates that are inconsistent with the predictions of the standard model of inside-out collapse, we perform a series on numerical hydrodynamic simulations of the gravitational collapse of molecular cloud cores with various initial masses, rotation rates, and sizes. We focus on the early Class I stage of star formation when circumstellar disks are exposed to high rates of mass deposition from infalling envelopes. Our numerical modeling reproduces the large observed spread in accretion rates inferred for embedded YSOs in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus star-forming regions by Enoch et al., yielding 37%-75% of objects with sub-Shu accretion rates (M) over dot less than or similar to 10(-6) M(circle dot) yr(-1) and 1%-2% of objects with super-Shu accretion rates (M) over dot > 10(-5) M(circle dot) yr(-1). Mass accretion rates in the Class I stage have a lognormal distribution, with its shape controlled by disk viscosity and disk temperature. The spread in (M) over dot is greater in models with lower viscosity and smaller in models with higher viscosity and higher disk temperature, suggesting that gravitational instability may be a dominant cause of the observed diversity in (M) over dot in embedded YSOs. Our modeling predicts a weak dependence between the mean mass accretion rates and stellar masses in the Class I stage, in sharp contrast to the corresponding steep dependence for evolved T Tauri stars and brown dwarfs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available