4.7 Article

CHEMICAL ABUNDANCES OF SEVEN IRREGULAR AND THREE TIDAL DWARF GALAXIES IN THE M81 GROUP

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 705, Issue 1, Pages 723-738

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/723

Keywords

galaxies: abundances; galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: individual (Garland, KDG 61, UGC 5336); galaxies: interactions

Funding

  1. NSF [AST05-06054]
  2. National Science Foundation ( United States)
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council ( United Kingdom)
  4. National Research Council ( Canada)
  5. CONICYT ( Chile)
  6. Australian Research Council ( Australia)
  7. Ministerio da Ciencia e Tecnologia ( Brazil)
  8. Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion Productiva ( Argentina)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have derived nebular abundances for 10 dwarf galaxies belonging to the M81 Group, including several galaxies which do not have abundances previously reported in the literature. For each galaxy, multiple H II regions were observed with GMOS-N at the Gemini Observatory in order to determine abundances of several elements ( oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, neon, and argon). For seven galaxies, at least one H II region had a detection of the temperature sensitive [O III] lambda 4363 line, allowing a direct determination of the oxygen abundance. No abundance gradients were detected in the targeted galaxies, and the observed oxygen abundances are typically in agreement with the well-known metallicity-luminosity relation. However, three candidate tidal dwarf galaxies lie well off this relation: UGC 5336, Garland, and KDG 61. The nature of these systems suggests that UGC 5336 and Garland are indeed recently formed systems, whereas KDG 61 is most likely a dwarf spheroidal galaxy which lies along the same line of sight as the M81 tidal debris field. We propose that these H II regions formed from previously enriched gas which was stripped from nearby massive galaxies (e.g., NGC 3077 and M81) during a recent tidal interaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available