3.9 Article Proceedings Paper

Clostridium difficile colitis -: An increasingly aggressive iatrogenic disease?

Journal

ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
Volume 137, Issue 10, Pages 1096-1100

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.137.10.1096

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypothesis: The diagnosis of Clostridium difficile colitis is increasing in frequency, with worsening patient outcomes. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: University hospital. Patients: One hundred fifty-seven patients diagnosed with C difficile colitis between 1994-2000. Main Outcome Measures: Resolution of disease, operative intervention, and death. Results: Compared with our previous 10-year experience, overall cases of C difficile colitis have risen by more than 30%, and immunocompromised patients comprise a larger proportion of those affected. One third of patients were receiving posttransplantation medication, chemotherapy, or had human immunodeficiency virus. Of these, 2 (4%) of 51 required surgical intervention and 10 (20%) of 51 died. An additional 18.5% of patients had diabetes, renal failure, or both. Of these, 2 (7%) of 30 required surgery and 4 (13%) of 30 died. Only 9.5% of patients had prophylactic perioperative antibiotics as a sole risk factor; 2 (13%) of 15 required surgery and 3 (20%) of 15 died. The overall mortality rate was 15.3%, increased from 3.5% in our previous series. Neither need for surgery nor mortality differed among these patient groups. Conclusions: The frequency of C difficile colitis remains high and seems to be associated with increasing mortality. Among patients with positive C difficile toxin assay results, immunocompromise and delayed diagnosis no longer seem to be associated with higher risk for death. All patients taking antibiotics are at risk and require early recognition and aggressive medical intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available