4.7 Article

THE GALAXY POPULATION OF LOW-REDSHIFT ABELL CLUSTERS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 703, Issue 2, Pages 2024-2032

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/2024

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: fundamental parameters (colors, luminosities)

Funding

  1. NSERC
  2. INAOE
  3. CONACyT [P45952-F]
  4. Academia Mexicana de Ciencias-Royal Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a study of the luminosity and color properties of galaxies selected from a sample of 57 low-redshift Abell clusters. We utilize the non-parametric dwarf-to-giant ratio (DGR) and the blue galaxy fraction (f(b)) to investigate the clustercentric radial-dependent changes in the cluster galaxy population. Composite cluster samples are combined by scaling the counting radius by r(200) to minimize radius selection bias. The separation of galaxies into a red and blue population was achieved by selecting galaxies relative to the cluster color-magnitude relation. The DGR of the red and blue galaxies is found to be independent of cluster richness (B(gc)), although the DGR is larger for the blue population at all measured radii. A decrease in the DGR for the red and red+blue galaxies is detected in the cluster core region, while the blue galaxy DGR is nearly independent of radius. The f(b) is found not to correlate with B(gc); however, a steady decline toward the inner-cluster region is observed for the giant galaxies. The dwarf galaxy f(b) is approximately constant with clustercentric radius except for the inner-cluster core region where f(b) decreases. The clustercentric radial dependence of the DGR and the galaxy blue fraction indicates that it is unlikely that a simple scenario based on either pure disruption or pure fading/reddening can describe the evolution of infalling dwarf galaxies; both outcomes are produced by the cluster environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available