4.7 Article

Heterogeneous expression of cell adhesion molecules by endothelial cells in ARDS

Journal

JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 198, Issue 2, Pages 270-275

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/path.1186

Keywords

Gram-negative sepsis; ARDS; adhesion molecules; endothelial cell; lung; microvasculature; heterogeneity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) can be associated with septic shock and multiple organ failure caused by an uncontrolled systemic inflammatory response to Gram-negative bacterial infection. While in animal models the key role of the endothelial adhesion molecules ICAM-1, E-selectin, and VCAM in ARDS has been extensively studied, there are scarcely any corresponding pathomorphological studies of human lung tissue. Hence, little is known about whether there is a comparable, or even heterogeneous, expression pattern of these molecules in the human pulmonary vasculature. This study was therefore undertaken to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of the constitutively expressed PECAM (CD31) and the inducible molecules ICAM-1, E-selectin, and VCAM in ARDS lungs from patients who had died in septic shock induced by Gram-negative bacteria. While in all specimens (ARDS and normal lungs) there was homogeneous strong expression of PECAM in all vessels, ICAM-1 was clearly up-regulated in ARDS lungs. E-selectin and VCAM were not expressed by endothelial cells (ECs) in normal lungs, but in ARDS lungs there was strong expression of both molecules in larger vessels, while in the capillaries there was only mosaic-like weak expression of a few ECs. This immunohistochemical investigation demonstrates the induction and up-regulation of adhesion molecules in human ARDS lungs, comparable to that described in animal models. There is also markedly heterogeneous expression of E-selectin and VCAM, indicating toporegional differences in the function of pulmonary ECs. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available