4.4 Article

238U, 226Ra, 210Pb, 232Th and 40K activities in soil profiles of the Flysch sector (Central Spanish Pyrenees)

Journal

APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages 579-589

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0969-8043(02)00131-8

Keywords

natural radionuclides; profile distribution; edaphogenesis; tertiary continental Flysch; Central Spanish Pyrenees

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Distributions of natural gamma-emitting radionuclides were determined in three soil profiles developed on Tertiary sedimentary materials in mountain landscapes of the Central Spanish Pyrenees. Radioisotope activities (Bq kg(-1)) lie in the range of 0-53 for U-238; 19-33 for Ra-226; 7-75 for Pb-210; 24-48 for Th-232 and 335-562 for K-40. U-238 and Pb-210 activities show an important variability down the soil profiles. 238U was markedly depleted in all upper soil layers and highly enriched in lower layers of two soil profiles. 210Pb exhibits very dissimilar distribution patterns in all three soils. 226Ra and 232Th had quite uniform depth distributions. 40K showed depletion in both upper and lower layers in one soil profile but remained fairly constant in the other two profiles. U-238/Ra-226 activity ratios (ARs) have been used to assess equilibrium in the 238 U decay chain and as indicators of edaphogenesis in the studied soil profiles. Maintenance of initial proportionality in the ratio of Th-232/U-238 activities has been assessed through ARs of their progenies. Additionally, a variety of soil properties were measured down the soil profiles. Among soils, variation in radionuclide activies may be due to differences in carbonate content, organic matter and/or grain size. In this environment, soil properties differently affect mobilization of natural radionuclides. The association of some radiologic properties with soil layers suggest a relationship between soil processes and radionuclide distribution. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available