4.6 Article

Bacillus anthracis spores germinate extracellularly at air-liquid interface in an invitro lung model under serum-free conditions

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 119, Issue 3, Pages 711-723

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jam.12872

Keywords

anthrax; Bacillus anthracis; germination; lung epithelial; spore; Sterne

Funding

  1. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research [48446]
  2. Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology Directorate [HSHQPM-14-X-00037]
  3. United States Department of Energy [DE-AC06-76RLO]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsTo better understand the parameters that govern spore dissemination after lung exposure using invitro cell systems. Methods and ResultsWe evaluated the kinetics of uptake, germination and proliferation of Bacillus anthracis Sterne spores in association with human primary lung epithelial cells, Calu-3 and A549 cell lines. We also analysed the influence of various cell culture medium formulations related to spore germination. ConclusionsWe found negligible spore uptake by epithelial cells, but germination and proliferation of spores in the serum-free extracellular environment was evident. Spore germination was appreciably higher in immortalized cell cultures than in primary epithelial cells. Additionally, spores still germinated apically at a mucus-secreting air-liquid interface lung barrier that was devoid of cell culture medium much earlier than medium-only controls. Significance and Impact of the StudyThe role of lung epithelial cells in B.anthracis spore dissemination after inhalation remains poorly defined and rather controversial. These results are novel as they show spore germination is appreciably enhanced in the presence of lung cells invitro, however, the cell line and cell state (air-liquid interface vs submerged in medium) dictates the extent of germination and in some cases proliferation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available