4.5 Article

Sexual dimorphism in the energy content of weight change

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages 1339-1348

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802065

Keywords

total body energy content; total body fat; weight change; body composition; nutritional assessment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The energy content of weight change is assumed to be sex- and age-neutral at 3500 kcal/pound or 32.2 Mj/kg. OBJECTIVES: As sexual dimorphism in body composition generally exists in mammals, the primary hypothesis advanced and tested was that the energy content of weight change differs between men and women. DESIGN: The energy content of 129 adult men and 287 women was measured by neutron activation analysis. Cross-sectional energy content prediction models were developed and then evaluated in two longitudinal samples: one that used the same methods in 26 obese women losing weight; and the other a compilation of 18 previously reported weight change-body composition studies. RESULTS: Multiple regression modeling identified weight, sex, age and height as total energy content predictor variables with significant sexxweight (P < 0.001) and agexweight (P < 0.001) interactions; total model r(2) and s.e.e. were 0.89 and 107.3 MJ, respectively. The model's predictive value was supported in both longitudinal evaluation samples. Model calculations using characteristics of representative adults. gaining or losing weight suggested that the energy content of weight change in women (similar to30.1-32.2 Mj/kg) is near to the classical value of 32.2 MJ/kg and that in men the value is substantially lower, -21.8-23.8 MJ/kg. The predicted energy content of weight change increases by about 10% in older (age similar to70 y) vs younger (similar to35 y) men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual dimorphism and age-dependency appears to exist in the estimated energy content of weight change and these observations have important clinical and research implications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available