4.6 Article

Phytoplankton production systems in a shellfish hatchery: variations of the bacterial load and diversity of vibrios

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 118, Issue 6, Pages 1264-1275

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jam.12787

Keywords

bacteria; continuous culture system; intermediate scale culture; microbiota; phytoplankton production systems; shellfish hatchery; Vibrio

Funding

  1. BAPOHATCH project, Secretaria de Estado de I+D+i, Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [AGL2011-29765]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsOutbreaks of disease caused by some Vibrio species represent the main production bottleneck in shellfish hatcheries. Although the phytoplankton used as food is one of the main sources of bacteria, studies of the associated bacterial populations, specifically vibrios, are scarce. The aim of the study was the microbiological monitoring of the microalgae as the first step in assessing the risk disease for bivalve cultures. Methods and ResultsTwo phytoplankton production systems were sampled weekly throughout 1-year period in a bivalve hatchery. Quantitative analysis revealed high levels of marine heterotrophic bacteria in both systems throughout the study. Presumptive vibrios were detected occasionally and at low concentrations. In most of the cases, they belonged to the Splendidus and Harveyi clades. ConclusionsThe early detection of vibrios in the microalgae may be the key for a successful bivalve culture. Their abundance and diversity were affected by factors related to the hatchery environment. Significance and Impact of the StudyThis work represents the first long study where the presence of vibrios was evaluated rigorously in phytoplankton production systems and provides a suitable microbiological protocol to control and guarantee the quality of the algal cultures to avoid the risk of transferring potential pathogens to shellfish larvae and/or broodstock.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available