4.4 Article

Layer-specific reductions in GFAP-reactive astroglia in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia

Journal

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
Volume 57, Issue 2-3, Pages 127-138

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00339-0

Keywords

postmortem; human; frontal cortex; morphometry; glia

Categories

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH61578, MH45488] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroimaging studies have implicated the prefronto-striatal loop as a substrate for the cognitive deficits in schizophrenia (SCHZ). Postmortem morphometric studies reveal that layers TIT and V of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dIPFC), which gave rise to glutamatergic projections to neostriatum, demonstrate the most structural pathology in this region of the SCHZ. These neuronal alterations in SCHZ are not accompanied by marked glial changes as revealed by Nissl staining. We examined the glial-type specific pathology in SCHZ by analyzing the glial fibrillary acidic protein- (GFAP) immunoreactive astroglia in contrast to the Nissl-stained general pool of glial cells in dIPFC (area 9) from 9 subjects with SCHZ and 15 psychiatrically normal control subjects. In layer V of the dlPFC in SCHZ, there was a significant 32% reduction in the GFAP-area fraction, 81% increase in the density of the GFAP-positive cell bodies and a 14% decrease in the width of the cortical layer V, as compared to the control subjects, None of these parameters were affected in layers TIT and IV in the SCHZ. Therefore, only subtle, type- and layer-specific glial pathology is present in the dIPFC in SCHZ. Astroglial pathology in dlPFC may reflect disturbances of the neuron-glia interactions in layer V and may be related to the dysfunctional prefronto-striatal circuits, dopaminergic alterations and cognitive pathology in SCHZ. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available